Warfare

As with most of its systems, the Technoanarchist approach to warfare involves lots of livestreaming.

Conflict areas would be blanketed with internet access and then flood the area with devices capable of streaming events from on the ground and receiving external perspectives.

Initially, the first move would be to stop all bombing. Under these conditions networks are built with the goal of getting these communications devices into the hands of those giving the orders.

Devices should make a genuine effort to avoid localizing of the user. “Enemy” leaders should be free to communicate without increasing their risk of reprisal.

As a sign of good faith, the accounts that they use should be able to contact each other. It creates a new robust network that could be used for planning attacks, but the goal is to demonstrate that we are about strengthening their infrastructure even when it creates a risk for us.

This would all work so much better if Biden had the political will and capital to stop bombing. That's not anywhere near on the table currently to the extent it sounds unrealistic to propose it.

If the meme existed and was popular that this is feasible to do, and that Biden could be the one to lead the world out of dropping explosives from the sky, he might seize the moment.

Another, more controversial, aspect of the war movement is the storyline that the people who influenced the US government to stop bombing are in the process of forming a Caliphate.

It seems easier at times to address the problem of homelessness and hunger under the premise that without those it will become increasingly difficult to find soldiers.

Dealing with those problems on a global scale, however, is much easier if you can free up the resources currently going to defense.